Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:12:53 -0500
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        marino@freebsd.org, freebsd.contact@marino.st
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r365590 - in head/cad/spice: . files
Message-ID:  <53F66EE5.7080500@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140822.070939.1253386656808735449.hrs@allbsd.org>
References:  <201408211941.s7LJf6de048334@svn.freebsd.org>	<53F663B2.3000800@marino.st> <20140822.070939.1253386656808735449.hrs@allbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--rHnn4q3oHTij2wCRfKRL9aUgJg28lEPSG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 8/21/2014 5:09 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> wrote
>   in <53F663B2.3000800@marino.st>:
>=20
> fr> On 8/21/2014 21:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> fr> > Author: hrs
> fr> > Date: Thu Aug 21 19:41:06 2014
> fr> > New Revision: 365590
> fr> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/365590
> fr> > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r365590/
>=20
> ...
>=20
> fr> I'm sorry, but using freebsd-specific <bsd.prog.mk> in a ports vend=
or
> fr> makefile is NOT an improvement and frankly puts the build at risk o=
n
> fr> DragonFly.
> fr>
> fr> I wish there was a rule that ports should not use system make fragm=
ents.
> fr>  This is not a good practice.  This port had a perfectly working an=
d
> fr> generic makefile before.
> fr>
> fr> There's a good chance this just broke spice on DragonFly as the sys=
tem
> fr> make file these are different.
>=20
>  I can understand that vendor's Makefile should be platform-neutral,
>  but I do not think there is advantage to maintain
>  ${FILESDIR}/Makefile in a way not to use FreeBSD-specific stuff
>  because it is used only by the port.  Should we care about build on
>  DragonFly?

No! This is FreeBSD. Ports is only officially supported on FreeBSD.

There are plenty of other ports using bsd.prog.mk.

>=20
> -- Hiroki
>=20


--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery


--rHnn4q3oHTij2wCRfKRL9aUgJg28lEPSG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT9m7mAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPAlwH/1ghr3/3aNoAO11JcvN38JZ6
apLnmQe2oop2WU/P7aX23JCym8+IHYHTJHz/J4FYKd/9PhTcSls0SYBKa7hC3P3D
xilS7pWCDJ3fMVnYQCxbBEZwbrH4QNir2RvHBE3S8+OAztE20aIuZmjyHYmLNnxu
Nir0QfYi9/hY9F9tyYPMjajc6LImOr8eRZpelc2jUwh3TkRREUKnOdD8TOkjd+mx
kae0XMTDDNi7lXFTm+lNslfaAODsMLr7/v1JiHiJJFvUuwggRafHSumifXsunqHY
aqeQlRz3rZEQmHKbU3O3RHshYHqSAE1YGTJ+CPp4qHnfFuO969pOXcuLMt93RCw=
=i3Xd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rHnn4q3oHTij2wCRfKRL9aUgJg28lEPSG--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53F66EE5.7080500>