Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:10:08 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I am confused about tracking stable Message-ID: <14953.14800.302302.403387@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <98615336@toto.iv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com> types: > The reason I use it is for updating my production servers. I have a test > machine that I update to the latest -STABLE, and then test for a week. > If everything goes fine, I then upgrade any production servers I want to > upgrade to that EXACT version that I tested (using date tags.) Paranoid, > I know, but I'm too lazy to fix things after the fact. I think that's intelligent, not paranoid. However, I wonder about using cvsup and date tags to update the other systems. Wouldn't it be a little easier/faster/etc. to do the nfs buildworld/installworld split thing that's been discussed here, or rdist the source tree from the test machine to the other machines? Thanx, <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14953.14800.302302.403387>