Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:35:42 +0100
From:      Marco Steinbach <coco@executive-computing.de>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Follow a port of a specific major verion
Message-ID:  <4D51389E.6040803@executive-computing.de>
In-Reply-To: <44tyge7n5f.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
References:  <4D50217A.6030700@inbox.lv> <44aai7vh5b.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>	<4D511D49.4010704@inbox.lv> <44tyge7n5f.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Lowell Gilbert wrote on 08.02.2011 12:59:
> Mikael Bak <mbak@inbox.lv> writes:
> 
>> I was not aware I could just install the same software over the other
>> without first removing it. Shouldn't I do that? I would not want to end
>> up with a broken software or a broken ports database.
> 
> No, you want to remove the old port before installing the new one.  But
> you can *build* the new port before removing the old one.

The OP should keep an eye on dependencies, though.  A good foot-shooter 
is updating one port, and then, during updating a different port having 
to install a newer version of a port they both depend on.

Which might require a rebuild of the original port, resulting in having, 
at best, double-downtime of a service.

Incidentially, I ran into this just right now, so I felt compelled to 
state what might seem obious :)

[...]

MfG CoCo
PS: I seem to remember devel/pcre being a good candidate for that with 
postfix and some other ports.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D51389E.6040803>