Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:46:12 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>, jbeich@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r384676 - head/cad/kicad Message-ID: <20150425154612.GB91290@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <553BA87A.4060002@marino.st> References: <618l-7yth-wny@FreeBSD.org> <201504250611.t3P6B37U069425@gw.catspoiler.org> <20150425143648.GA91290@graf.pompo.net> <553BA87A.4060002@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le sam 25 avr 15 à 16:45:14 +0200, John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> écrivait : > This is probably an ignorant question, but what does cad/kicad bring > over cad/kicad-devel, which is currently building normally IIUC. Is > there concrete justification to have both at this point? Maybe we can > just retire kicad. It sounds fixable but it sounds like it's a lot of > work to fix too. Not a silly question at all, I was wondering too! As their names say, Kicad is the official, stable, release, and kicad-devel is a development snapshot. But the latest stable release is dated on 2013 jul 07, and upstream produces regulary new devel snapshot. -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150425154612.GB91290>