Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Robert =?unknown-8bit?Q?Blacqui=E8re?= <freebsd-current@guldan.demon.nl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My acpi-errant laptop will be at the 'con Message-ID: <20030908105928.J85644@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20030908174121.GD68008@bombur.guldan.demon.nl> References: <20030908010950.F22654@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030908093244.U85288@root.org> <20030908174121.GD68008@bombur.guldan.demon.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The reason why it's so different is that acpidump has been changed between when you dumped and patched it and now. The best way around this is to compile your modified ASL using iasl(8) and then disassemble it again using acpidump -f acpi_dsdt.dsl -d > acpi_dsdt_new.dsl and then diff that output against *orig. -Nate On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquière wrote: > It's a lot ... 9666 lines... so i put it up on de site. > > plus the acpi code from current running bios. > > working patched version: > http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl > > in bios version: > http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt_orig.dsl > > and the diff -u > http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.diff > > Robert > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:33:19AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > Could you post a diff -u of this against the original ASL so I can know > > what issues it had? > > > > Thanks, > > Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030908105928.J85644>