Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:02:21 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Torbjorn Granlund <tege@swox.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Suggestion for FAQ Message-ID: <200110110502.f9B52LX61405@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> In-Reply-To: <86ofnfjaao.fsf@king.swox.se> References: <XFMail.011010170908.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <86ofnfjaao.fsf@king.swox.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-573423661P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit If memory serves me right, Torbjorn Granlund wrote: > That -stable supports SMP Athlon is great news! Since the load of the > system is coarse-grained, current SMP should be perfectly adequate. > > Yes, it really ought to be mentioned, and the kernel source (some > *apic*.h file) should perhaps also mention that Athlon systems will > work. Its current wording sound like it excludes Athlon. If this is to be mentioned in the release documentation (and this probably is a good idea), it should go in the hardware list. Specifically: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware/i386/proc-i386.sgml The current text is pretty vague, it could use some fleshing out. I admit to being pretty clueless about non-Intel processors, so I'm probably the wrong person to try to do this. But I'd be happy to handle markup and proofreading for any text anyone would like to toss my way. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-573423661P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE7xSfd2MoxcVugUsMRAjdbAJ9HkFa7+GZ9cFxCIf640y1tGotLvQCg5cfs fnHcaXVOhtZaIhodH8mQahk= =0kRV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-573423661P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110110502.f9B52LX61405>