Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 22:34:25 -0600 From: Chris Csanady <ccsanady@nyx.pr.mcs.net> To: Brian Tao <taob@risc.org> Cc: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703040434.WAA01099@nyx.pr.mcs.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 03 Mar 1997 23:01:53 -0500. <Pine.BSF.3.95.970303230052.16666B-100000@alpha.risc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Charles Henrich wrote: >> >> Unfortunatly I probably will not be able to leave the code running >> for a long period of time, but I wanted to be at the top for a few >> hours anyway :) > > What is the machine normally used for? If it is allowable, >setting up a cron job to start a bunch of clients after work hours and >killing it before the day starts again would still be a great help. No, no, no. What you want to do is to start the client on the idle queue... then you can utilize every last unused cycle. :) I think that the idle procs are also on that queue, so it might not be such a good idea for FreeBSD-SMP right now. man idprio -Chris Csanady >-- >Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) >"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703040434.WAA01099>