Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:54:31 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux Message-ID: <20080306055431.GV68971@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <47CEFCA0.1060600@chuckr.org> References: <20080303.224256.635730757.imp@bsdimp.com> <200803041701.36466.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20080303.235128.41690803.imp@bsdimp.com> <47CEFCA0.1060600@chuckr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mYYhpFXgKVw71fwr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:03:44PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: >I bet a very large portion of those among us who are professional codes >have had been forced at some time to port our make, whether it was the >original pmake, or the up-to-date version (I did the most up to date I >could manage. I looked at porting pmake to Tru64 about 9 years ago and rapidly decided I couldn't justify the effort (I only wanted to port a couple of FreeBSD utilities) and re-wrote the relevant Makefiles. I applaud Warner's efforts here as increasing the portability of FreeBSD utilities is very worthwhile. >The politicians amongst us will kill it, which I'm very osrry to predict I hope not. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --mYYhpFXgKVw71fwr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHz4cX/opHv/APuIcRAvl7AJsGviWoyeaYOxt6CwSGxwAVEcH2GACfWLIq kV6FoWsU24q8l6NiW+Bvxqc= =jkRN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYYhpFXgKVw71fwr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080306055431.GV68971>