Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:35:04 -0800
From:      Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c
Message-ID:  <d8a0b76204110815355347d1e3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200411081309.05747.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200410300735.i9U7ZrL2031884@repoman.freebsd.org> <d8a0b76204110519223860ef33@mail.gmail.com> <200411081309.05747.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:09:05 -0500, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I don't think multithreaded processes are ready for FULL_PREEMPTION yet on
> either scheduler, so I wouldn't use FULL_PREEMPTION for now.

I already had intended to do a couple of test runs with just WITNESS +
INVARIANTS + SCHED_ULE + PREEMPTION ... (possible disabling WITNESS or
INVATIANTS) to see if the panic is triggered because of
FULL_PREEMPTION or if it is a general WITNESS / INVARIANTS issue.

I'll try to post my results here ...

-- 
  Pascal Hofstee



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d8a0b76204110815355347d1e3>