Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:01:28 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Simple x86 assembler question Message-ID: <20011028180128.A59388@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011028092133.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 09:21:33AM -0700 References: <003901c15f3c$5bdef760$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <XFMail.011028092133.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 09:21:33AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > Almost. The '2' there is a multiplier on (I think) %eax, so it uses > 'ebx + 2 * eax + 0xe90' for the memory address. Either that or 'eax + > 2 * ebx + 0xe90'. Check the gas info page for the AT&T syntax to > figure out exactly which. (Or use nasm's diassembler which turns out > Intel format asm.) (ports/devel/nasm, ndisasm) BTW, Gas now supports Intel syntax. * doc/c-i386.texi (i386-Arch): New section. (i386-Syntax): Mention .intel_syntax and .att_syntax. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011028180128.A59388>