Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 20:37:54 -0700 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: www/firefox on RPI2: error: instruction requires: armv6t2 Message-ID: <20170511033754.GA74153@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJwjRmTuXTcG2%2Bxm4tEwV6NRec9Y_kP62_Zza1=YQq508d0fFQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <80D06D70-8534-456C-A66F-CDD4CE0D5811@FreeBSD.org> <7306a091-1350-d6cb-b329-c56f2d80c0bf@freebsd.org> <20170508161511.GA64826@www.zefox.net> <CAJwjRmR8NswYgkM6RjT5vi_OR63eaXCphV7_RToEnXzZqQKcWA@mail.gmail.com> <20170508233241.GA65262@www.zefox.net> <CAJwjRmSxxpNX44T1Aqrg8VWceP4zL1BO5s33RZX8VGiWYo=dnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170509230236.GA69546@www.zefox.net> <CAJwjRmQiON9J8zZyb7ad5YNo7Ccrdwd0W%2B-6rqzwdcZp%2BEXv%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <20170510151019.GA70628@www.zefox.net> <CAJwjRmTuXTcG2%2Bxm4tEwV6NRec9Y_kP62_Zza1=YQq508d0fFQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
With freebsd at FreeBSD www.zefox.com 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #50 r318138: Wed May 10 10:30:51 PDT 2017 bob@www.zefox.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RPI2 arm ports at Revision: 440570 and using root@www:/usr/ports/www/firefox # make CFLAGS='-mcpu=cortex-a7' -DBATCH > make.log & the compilation seems to halt with /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-53.0.2/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/common_audio/signal_processing/filter_ar_fast_q12_armv7.S:88:3: error: instruction requires: armv6t2 sbfx r11, r6, #12, #16 ^ /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-53.0.2/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/common_audio/signal_processing/filter_ar_fast_q12_armv7.S:99:3: error: instruction requires: armv6t2 sbfx r11, r6, #12, #16 ^ /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-53.0.2/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/common_audio/signal_processing/filter_ar_fast_q12_armv7.S:142:3: error: instruction requires: armv6t2 sbfx r8, r6, #12, #16 ^ gmake[6]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-53.0.2/config/rules.mk:989: filter_ar_fast_q12_armv7.o] Error 1 I'm told this is likely caused by CFLAGS='-mcpu=cortex-a7', which is needed to avoid a "NEON not enabled" error earlier in the compile. Would a bug report be redundant? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170511033754.GA74153>