Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:33:28 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r435349 - in head: astro/gmapcatcher audio/last-cmus audio/logitechmediaserver-superdatetime audio/mehdiaplayer audio/pidgin-musictracker audio/xpi-musicpm biology/treeviewx chinese/fci...
Message-ID:  <20170303173328.GA50231@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <faad4855-bae1-3598-25cc-0e056d64491c@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201703031600.v23G0Koq052052@repo.freebsd.org> <20170303161426.GA55305@FreeBSD.org> <faad4855-bae1-3598-25cc-0e056d64491c@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 06:09:29PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> They may have had the distfile lying around, but they would have needed
> to manually do something to be able to build the port, either remove the
> BROKEN line, or set TRYBROKEN, or NO_IGNORE.

That's what I *likely* would've done (if I didn't have commit bit): fix the
port in the fastest way possible *for myself*, and move on.  Removing one
single line from the Makefile is much easier than fixing the port for real
and filing a PR (or forking it at GitHub and sending a pull request, LOL).

> The ports are not obliterated from this universe, they have been marked
> BROKEN for six months, if anyone is interested in some of them, it is
> always possible to resurrect them.

While that's true, it takes some effort to actually find the removed port
and properly resurrect it.  But then again: it's becoming ridiculous, I'm
obviously losing this argument here so why don't we just all move along...

Peace,

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170303173328.GA50231>