Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 18:02:27 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc make.conf Message-ID: <19980417180227.45217@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <199804170907.CAA12297@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from asami@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 02:07:08AM -0700 References: <19980417060627.25427@nagual.pp.ru> <199804170907.CAA12297@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 02:07:08AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Adding things from non-existance is harder than uncomment/edit some > * pre-existen line, so it will be more comfortable to have _all_ > * bsd.port.mk variables mentioned in make.conf.ports > > I disagree. The header of bsd.port.mk is already over 200 lines > long. It will be useless to duplicate that elsewhere because it will > very likely get out of sync very quickly (both because committers > can't remember to update the same thing in many places and because > /etc is not updated by "make world"). Better remove header from bsd.port.mk and put it to /etc/make.ports.conf, then include /etc/make.ports.conf in bsd.port.mk. To not stay out of sync some check must be added in bsd.port.mk which yell about obsoleted /etc/make.ports.conf needs upgrade. I mean variables that really supposed to be changed, not all ones. > I've already said everything I want on this topic. If we can agree to > disagree, I'm going to take out everything but HAVE_MOTIF in > /etc/make.conf. Sorry, but that's my area. Well, your choice. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980417180227.45217>