Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 15:49:19 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra) Cc: peter@spinner.dialix.com, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/tcl Makefile patch01 patch02 Message-ID: <199606190619.PAA00203@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199606190522.WAA12112@austin.polstra.com> from "John Polstra" at Jun 18, 96 10:22:50 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Polstra stands accused of saying: > > The sources should be imported in their distributed form, onto the > vendor branch. Then the necessary patches should be committed as deltas. > > This is not the same as a port, and it shouldn't be treated like one. It _is_ a port, and it _should_ be treated like one, modulo a few changes. Basically the checked-out version should look like a port after 'make extract'. When a new version comes along, the contents of the 'work' directory will change, and likewise files/patch* etc. > John Polstra jdp@polstra.com My impression anyway... -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606190619.PAA00203>