Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:56:29 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: Unmaintained ports with fetch errors Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502141349570.23808-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <20050214193022.GA29045@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > It's probably mostly overlapping, but it's not the source I'm using. > I'll compile a list of ports and send them once the current build is > finished. You could always use http://portsmon.firepipe.net/portsconcordanceforbuilderror.py?build_error=fetch&sortby=maintainer which shows 431 ports. This page is the union of all the summaries of all pointyhat runs, so if some of the runs are stale, there will be false positives. However, each link to an errorlog uses the latest one across all the buildenvs, so this is mitigated somewhat. Of the 431 fetch errors, only about 150 seem to be for unmaintained ports. Note: some of the errorlog links that portsmon reports have been broken for a while. portsmon uses the data from the pointyhat index pages and those index pages sometimes seem to be out-of-date. I have not had enough time recently to try to go understand where the problem lies. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0502141349570.23808-100000>