Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:18:22 -0700 (PDT) From: ggm@dstc.edu.au To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: i386/12649: hosts.allow requires entry for BOTH tcpd and telnetd in 'tcp_wrapped' inetd. Message-ID: <19990715111822.24D3314D65@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 12649 >Category: i386 >Synopsis: hosts.allow requires entry for BOTH tcpd and telnetd in 'tcp_wrapped' inetd. >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Jul 15 04:20:01 PDT 1999 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: George Michaelson >Release: 3.2-STABLE >Organization: DSTC pty/ltd >Environment: >Description: we have hosts.allow allowing telnetd, but all:all:deny at end. without tcpd:all:allow, the telnetd entry is not adequate to permit inbound telnet. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: it may actually be a documentation bug, relating to how tcpd is or is not needed in inetd. Sorry for lack of clarity. Is this a parasitic interaction between the two methods (inetd-integrated, and tcpd as daemon invoking telnetd) or is this a genuine bug, or is this a simple mis-configuration? >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990715111822.24D3314D65>