Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 06:24:33 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@x.org> Cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: option XSERVER deprecated? Message-ID: <2876.816963873@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Nov 1995 07:44:27 EDT." <199511211244.MAA03497@exalt.x.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Assuming there are no reasons uncovered that make it impractical, I see no reason why not. You could even pass the commit through Rich. > > No, apparently not. I notice that the GENERIC config in 2.1.0R had > option XSERVER commented out. Yet a (very) cursory look at the kernel > sources shows that XSERVER is still used and pcvt* is built differently > when it's defined. > > (The X server did run on the GENERIC kernel just long enough build my > own kernel. I didn't try switching VTs though.) > > Can I suggest that the kernel use the opposite logic, i.e. assume there > will be an X server and build accordingly? And for those who don't run X > there should be an option NOXSERVER. > > If I did the work would it be accepted and incorporated into the next > release? > > -- > > Kaleb KEITHLEY > X Consortium
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2876.816963873>