Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:23:35 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... Message-ID: <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/02/14 15:50, Juanitou wrote: >> [root at kabini1 >> <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, >> 10:44:17am] 546 % pkg update >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> Fetching meta.txz: 100% 964 B 1.0k/s 00:01 >> Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 409.1k/s 00:05 >> Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 355.0k/s 00:15 >> Processing new repository entries: 100% >> FreeBSD repository update completed. 23519 packages processed: >> 0 updated, 0 removed and 23519 added. >> whew !!!! that took (26.547 cpu + 1.978 sys) sec., 0:49.82 elapsed >> time tot, 57.2% CPU efficiency >> (208 text, 2553 data, 46448 max) KB, (0+1124) io, 0 pfs + 0 >> swaps >> [root at kabini1 >> <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, >> 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= >> curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has >> 7.37.1_3) >> dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has >> 9.1.7_4,2) >> gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has >> 2.24.22_4) >> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has >> 9.1.7_1) >> libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has >> 2.4.52,1) >> libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has >> 0.1.6_1) >> pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has >> 1.34.1_7) >> portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) >> readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) >> xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has >> 2.21.15_3) >> xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has >> 1.12.4_8,1) >> [root at kabini1 >> <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, >> 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 >> linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: >> textproc/linux-f10-expat >> linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: >> x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig >> linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs >> opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins >> [root at kabini1 >> <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, >> 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >> Your packages are up to date. > I guess you are mixing ports and packages. On the one hand, your ports > tree has been updated (portsnap fetch update?), and so your package > INDEX. On the other hand, the pkg repositories have not been updated > yet with the new versions of these ports. If these assumptions are > true, the above results are normal. > > I hope it helps, > Juan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I am using pkg whenever possible, in preference to ports, however, there are a few things that require ports (flash plugin for browsers, for example) .... seems unavoidable. Is there a way to work around this issue ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540689B7.9000006>