Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:32:32 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/10131: bug in strptime(3) Message-ID: <98756.930058352@axl.noc.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:25:59 -0400." <19990622092559.A25678@ppp18341.on.bellglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:25:59 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > The only advantage to a uuencoded patch (as opposed to gziped and then > uuencoded) is that it prevents people from destroying tabs with stupid > cut and paste errors. Hey, you're preaching to the converted. I _prefer_ uuencoded patches (even shars and tarballs), since I just query-pr -F XXXX | uudecode. :-) The only reason I mention it is because I'm under the impression that the majority of committers prefer patches provided inline. I've just trying to make it easier for team-mates. But since I now know that there are at least 3 other active committers who have preferences similar to my own, I think I'll shush and let the rest speak for themselves. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?98756.930058352>