Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      12 Jan 1998 22:38:40 +0100
From:      Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
To:        dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Cc:        Tom <tom@sdf.com>, Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Netcards
Message-ID:  <86iurpz82n.fsf@bitbox.follo.net>
In-Reply-To: dennis's message of Fri, 09 Jan 1998 17:34:23 -0500
References:  <3.0.32.19980109173418.00e5be40@etinc.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dennis <dennis@etinc.com> writes:

> >  This is raw socket stuff is interesting.  Example source please.  I
> >don't believe this problem exists anymore.  I know that Julian fixed
> >problems with routing sockets.  As a side point, routing sockets and raw
> >sockets can only be accessed by root processes.
> 
> Just look in raw_usrreq(). the default case is a panic. 

Fixed in revision 1.12 as of April 27, 1997.

Do you have anything else?  (I don't think any of us want panic()s to
occur for userland errors, though I think they often are the correct
path for a kernel error.)

Eivind.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86iurpz82n.fsf>