Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 May 2007 11:10:48 +0300
From:      "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie@gmail.com>
To:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 7.0 using GCC 4?
Message-ID:  <499c70c0705140110h447f469cuf2243cf5d9e3835a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46473A44.7050408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
References:  <46459240.8070403@paradise.net.nz> <20070512175214.GA22914@xor.obsecurity.org> <46470288.8040708@delphij.net> <20070513103941.7f603598@kan.dnsalias.net> <46472E5C.1060703@delphij.net> <46473A44.7050408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/13/07, O. Hartmann <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> LI Xin wrote:
> > Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 13 May 2007 20:20:24 +0800
> >> LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Will we be using 4.1.x series or 4.2.x series for 7.0-RELEASE? Just
> >>> curious :-)
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> --
> >>> Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>        http://www.delphij.net/
> >>> FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!
> >>>
> >>>
> >> 4.2.0. This is the first compiler version in GCC history to actually
> >> shrink compiled boot2 code and that alone gave it many points in 4.1
> >> vs. 4.2 shootout. There are other advantages as well. 4.2 can build
> >> unpatched firefox and have it working, while 4.1 builds binary with
> >> broken relocations, etc.
> >>
> >
> > Wow, that's great, thanks for the work!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> A while ago a discussion herein was triggered about this subject and as
> I remember myself, the decission was made in favor of gcc 4.1. Watching
> Linux/Gentoo Forums for a while I was reading many suggestions not using
> gcc 4.1.1 as it is standard in newest branches/distributions, because of
> several serious misbehaviours/generating broken code.
>
> We will see
> Oliver

A friend of mine who is a dev in Fedora said they wont go for GCC 4.1
since it brakes many things, and would go for GCC 4.2.x instead.


-- 
Regards,

-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0705140110h447f469cuf2243cf5d9e3835a>