Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 May 2005 14:53:13 +0800
From:      Foo Ji-Haw <jhfoo@nexlabs.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: is 4.11 still a good idea?
Message-ID:  <427F08D9.6010700@nexlabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050509064637.GA83454@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <mailman.0.1115610319.58274.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <427EE0F2.3090709@nexlabs.com> <20050509064637.GA83454@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Your point conflicts with the previous reply, that 5.3 is too cutting-edge.

By the way, is there native support for Java 1.4 on FreeBSD 5.x? It 
broke in my ports installation. I did manage to get the Linux compatible 
version up though.

Kris Kennaway wrote:

>On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:02:58PM +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi guys,
>>
>>I'm thinking of installing 4.11 on my next server, seeing that we have 
>>some Java issues on the 5.x series (I've been informed that native Java 
>>on 5.x is not a good idea).
>>    
>>
>
>Why not?
>
>  
>
>>Can I get some feedback on whether development and/ or support on 4.11 
>>is still active and updated? I've spent quite some time on the 4.x 
>>series, so I am quite comfortable with it.
>>    
>>
>
>It's certainly not very active.  Some developers still have an
>interest in it, but most of the development and bug fixing activity
>goes into the 5.x and 6.x branches.
>
>Kris
>  
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?427F08D9.6010700>