Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:53:07 +0000
From:      Jacula Modyun <jacula@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: REQUEST FOR TESTERS: `devel/mingw32-gcc'
Message-ID:  <20070824165307.GA31818@splork.wirewater.yow>
In-Reply-To: <46CB159F.4030404@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <1761162510.20070729004710@serebryakov.spb.ru> <46ACDB4B.6090707@FreeBSD.org> <46CB159F.4030404@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:41:03PM -0400, Coleman Kane <cokane@freebsd.org>=
 wrote:

> Coleman Kane wrote:
>> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>>> Hello ports,
>>>=20
>>>   Latest versions of `mingw32-binutils' and `mingw32-bin-msvcrt' were=
=20
>>> committed.
>>>   `mingw32-gcc' is on pipeline.
>>>   But it is BIG update: new version is 4.2.0
>>>   I ask you to test this `almost new' port before commit.
>>>=20
>>>   http://lev.serebryakov.spb.ru/download/port-mingw32-gcc-4.2.0.tar.gz
>>>=20
>>>   Many thanks to Coleman Kane <cokane@freebsd.org>, who helps me to=20
>>> prepare this update.
>>>    =20
>> I'd like to know what everyone else's experience with these new mingw32-=
=20
>> ports are. So far I have been building Win32 applications from my FreeBS=
D=20
>> box with these versions quite successfully. I think that the binutils an=
d=20
>> GCC are actually newer than the ones currently shipping with the MinGW32=
=20
>> binary distribution too.
>>=20
>> --=20
>> Coleman Kane
>>=20
> I haven't seen any activity on the above email, and I am curious if:
>  1) It was missed (and this really does affect people)
>  2) Nobody cross-compiles using the mingw32-* ports (it is really very=20
> handy!)
>  3) Nobody really cares that mingw32-gcc will move from 3.4.5 --> 4.2.0
>=20
> Please, if this affects you test out the above port tarball! Otherwise,=
=20
> this will end up going in and not take into account any problems that mig=
ht=20
> arise in your environment.
>=20
> --
> Coleman Kane
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Hello ports;

Hello Coleman Kane,

I'd like thank you for your work. I installed this version of mingw32-gcc.=
=20
Until now I've not any problem; I's a great port.
The only problem was with the mingw32-binutils port (it was broken for
size mismatch), but I committed a little patch.
Thank you very match.

Bye by JM

--=20
HASKELL:
	To call a spade a thpade.

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bWs7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070824165307.GA31818>