Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:37:16 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tandberg RDX QuikStor Message-ID: <49AB0E1C.50604@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903012259280.44063@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <49AAAA1C.4080804@netfence.it> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903011927000.43128@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <49AAF0AC.6080704@netfence.it> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903012259280.44063@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: >> On the cost you are right; they justify this with higher reliability. >> Whether this is true or not, I don't know. > > for sure not. Well, they say they resist a lot better to accidental falling; I never looked into them first hand, so I'm not able to tell if this is a myth or not. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49AB0E1C.50604>