Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Mar 2018 23:48:42 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: memory leak in Init 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
Message-ID:  <5A9AD1EA.3030403@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <201803031633.w23GXOcp039099@fire.js.berklix.net>
References:  <201803031633.w23GXOcp039099@fire.js.berklix.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
03.03.2018 23:33, Julian H. Stacey wrote:

> Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 03.03.2018 23:11, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>>
>>> Oops!  I got Subject & body wrong s/inetd/init/ !
>>>
>>> Was:        memory leak in inetd 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
>>> Should be:  memory leak in init 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
>>
>> There is no evidence that /sbin/init has memory leak (nor inetd), what makes you think so?
> 
> I got back about 500M of wap after kill -HUP 1

There may be plenty of reasons for that apart from init's "memory leak"
and init does not even show in the top. Please share your /etc/ttys file.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A9AD1EA.3030403>