Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 21:33:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uemacs port Message-ID: <199603252133.VAA04084@veda.is> In-Reply-To: <199603220508.VAA08835@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Mar 21, 96 09:08:48 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * I have uemacs 4.00 beta2 ready to fly (with FreeBSD additions from > * 3.12). Does it make sense to put it in the ports collection? If > * so, should it replace the existing 3.12 version or be imported as > * uemacs4 or something? > > Depends, on like how stable it is, how compatible it is, etc. :) > > Satoshi It seems stable. However, there are incompatibilities with some of the macro names and function-key pages. Numbered macroes seem to have been eliminated from the definitions for the function-key pages: "Word" "Box" and "Emacs" pages have been rewritten, but "Pascal" "C" "Cobol" and "Lisp" have not. Otherwise, there seem to be no new bugs of a critical nature. This version is from June 1995, the 3.12 version is from April 1993. Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603252133.VAA04084>