Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:55:10 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: "E.J. Bevenour" <ejbevenour@live.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: protobuf 3.1.0 Message-ID: <20161012205510.GD51420@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <CY4PR04MB0649892A8DDF0F275C9913CABEDD0@CY4PR04MB0649.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <CY4PR04MB0649A4ED5655C2962CC781EABEDD0@CY4PR04MB0649.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <20161012200609.GC51420@home.opsec.eu> <CY4PR04MB0649892A8DDF0F275C9913CABEDD0@CY4PR04MB0649.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > When I went to do a pull request they said the issue does not exist with protobuf 3.1.0 > https://github.com/pstavirs/ostinato/issues/199 > > My poudriere server succfuly built net/ostinato > http://45.62.227.38/build.html?mastername=amd64-testing&build=2016-10-12_17h10m03s > and I have not applyed that patch Ah, ok. I'll test without any patch, then. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161012205510.GD51420>