Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:20:19 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retiring static libpam support Message-ID: <42A75303.2090203@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <86ll5ksk44.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <864qc9mgqc.fsf@xps.des.no> <42A73773.1040508@elischer.org> <86ll5ksk44.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes: > > >>I gues it would be ok if the basic binary is static and the PAM >>modules are loaded using dlopen. >> >> > >You can't load dynamic objects from a static binary. It doesn't have >a working dlopen() (since dlopen() is implemented by the run-time >loader), and even if it did, there is no relocation table there to >resolve dependencies in the dynamic object. > > so basically that would screw us. >DES > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42A75303.2090203>