Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 00:53:00 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, peter@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux applications core if running (k)qemu Message-ID: <20080907215300.GH2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <200809062215.m86MF6NS040797@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808291711580.5866@thor.farley.org> <20080830113448.GA2152@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0809021552040.7934@thor.farley.org> <20080906104659.GA2113@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> <200809062215.m86MF6NS040797@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--KmlZJfNsL65MWMNI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:15:06AM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: > In article <20080906152929.GB2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> you write: > >-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- > > > >On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:46:59PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 03:56:33PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: > >> > On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > >> >=20 > >> > >On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 05:29:09PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: > >> > >>I am having trouble with kqemu.ko and linux.ko. If I run qemu with > >> > >>the following command, Linux applications (chroot, acroread, ls) w= ill > >> > >>start core dumping: > >> > >> qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 \ > >> > >> -drive file=3D/usr/QEMU/WinXP/c.img,if=3Dide,media=3Ddisk -boo= t c \ > >> > >> -std-vga -parallel none -serial none -monitor stdio \ > >> > >> -net nic,model=3De1000 -net tap,ifname=3Dtap0,script=3Dno -loc= altime > >> > >> > >> > >>Loading kqemu.ko does not cause the problem, but the cores start a > >> > >>little after WinXP starts running. Unloading kqemu.ko does not he= lp; > >> > >>the cores still happen but more randomly. I even tried unloading = all > >> > >>linux modules and reloading them without luck. It takes a reboot. > >> > >> > >> > >>Packages: > >> > >>qemu-devel-0.9.1s.20080620_1 > >> > >>kqemu-kmod-devel-1.4.0.p1 > >> > >>linux_base-f8-8_4 > >> > >> > >> > >>sysctl: > >> > >>compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 > >> > >> > >> > >>dmesg: > >> > >>kqemu version 0x00010400 > >> > >>kqemu: KQEMU installed, max_locked_mem=3D1792492kB. > >> > >> > >> > >>System is 7-STABLE as of r181963 with or without the patch to fix = RT > >> > >>signals from Chagin. > >> > > > >> > >Interestingly... Sean, can you provide ktrace/kdump log of coring > >> > >apps? thnx! > >> >=20 > >> > Here they are (good and bad): > >> > http://www.farley.org/freebsd/tmp/linuxulator_vs_kqemu/ > >> >=20 > >> > The good trace is after the bad trace. I just kept running ktrace > >> > /compat/linux/bin/date over and over until I got a good trace. Befo= re > >> > loading kqemu and running qemu, there were no core dumps. Also, I > >> > compared two bad traces and they were basically the same except for = PID > >> > and a couple of addresses (still very close in value). > >> >=20 > >>=20 > >> Most likely it is a tls problem again, some days ago kib@ has made MFC > >> r182684, probably it will help.. > > > >I doubt it. This seems to be an ingenious kqemu bug. As far as I remembe= r, > >it tries to use GDT/LDT. This probably has unwanted interaction with > >PCB_GS32BIT. >=20 > Wow. That corner of the code had escaped me so far, and yes this (in > amd64/linux32) looks like it won't like kqemu's seperating of the gdts > on SMP indeed. (it stores a pointer to &gdt[GUGS32_SEL] in pcb_gs32p and > lets linux processes manipulate the segment pointed to by it, and when > kqemu is (or was) running this won't be used by all cpus, see older threa= ds > like > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2008-May/004902.html > for the reasons.) >=20 > What I wonder tho is, won't this also cause problems without kqemu when > there are linux processes running on multiple cpus that manipulate this > segment because the gdt is then shared between the cpus? (like, linux > process on cpu 0 changes the segment, then linux process on cpu 1 comes > along and changes it again and then the linux process on cpu 0 will pick > it up from cpu 1?) At least I must have somehow assumed the shared gdt > wouldn't be changed later because of reasons like this... Very nice catch! Me and Peter Wemm discussed the right approach, that consists of actually providing per-cpu GDT. Patch is at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/amd64_gdt.1.patch Please, test and give a feedback. Even reports about thinks working the same as before the patch are important. >=20 > Anyway, fixing this will require changes to the kernel, I don't see how > kqemu could fix it by itself alone. :( See above. If you need some further kernel changes for kqemu, this is the best time to discuss them. --KmlZJfNsL65MWMNI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjETTsACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hWnQCdF1bzuSkQZzoTc5vSGywkEY+M F/IAoPQLavVdxMDEnc7G01UQCq9ecpik =UdU6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KmlZJfNsL65MWMNI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080907215300.GH2038>