Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:08:58 +0100 (CET) From: hm@kts.org (Hellmuth Michaelis) To: archie@whistle.com (Archie Cobbs) Cc: avalon@advicom.net, marcel@scc.nl, isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: D-channel communications Message-ID: <m103beE-00002PC@bert.kts.org> In-Reply-To: <199901210627.WAA28226@bubba.whistle.com> from Archie Cobbs at "Jan 20, 1999 10:27: 0 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Archie Cobbs wrote: > http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pppext-aodi-00.txt I doubt that a normal human being in Europe will ever using this given the current ISDN pricing over here. In an ideal world, where i don't have to pay for using X.31 on the D-channel and have a flat rate on my 2 B-channels it would be nice to have. On the other hand, almost all the benefits mentioned in the paper are mostly available right now, with the exception of that 16Kbit D-channel for data transfer in addition to 128kbits for the 2 B-channels and the possibly shorter connection setup time. hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis hm@kts.org Hamburg, Europe We all live in a yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m103beE-00002PC>