Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:12:55 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: dougb@FreeBSD.org Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, rpaulo@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, bz@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, anchie@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211501 - in head/sys: modules modules/send netinet netinet6 sys Message-ID: <20100821.191255.1023414010414033264.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1008211534450.1942@qbhto.arg> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1008211409420.1942@qbhto.arg> <26CBB559-FA72-4688-92E9-ED9CEA151B2C@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1008211534450.1942@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1008211534450.1942@qbhto.arg>
Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Rui Paulo wrote:
:
: > If your concern is to change the status quo, you do understand that
: > you picked the worst possible thread to hijack ? Esp. since the author
: > promised to roll out a man page.
:
: I didn't hijack anything, I responded to Ana's message saying that a
: man page was forthcoming. To me, since Ana intends to write a man page
: anyway I thought this was an excellent opportunity to highlight the
: fact that committing the man page along with the code is the preferred
: course of action.
Do we really need to have a bunch of threads about why people should
do the things they have promised to do?
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100821.191255.1023414010414033264.imp>