Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jun 2001 23:00:43 -0700
From:      dannyman <dannyman@toldme.com>
To:        Jason Halbert <jason@jason-n3xt.org>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vi
Message-ID:  <20010608230043.D418@dell.dannyland.org>
In-Reply-To: <JEENJJEOICOIFPANEHOOKEAGCBAA.jason@jason-n3xt.org>; from jason@jason-n3xt.org on Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 12:37:21AM -0500
References:  <JEENJJEOICOIFPANEHOOKEAGCBAA.jason@jason-n3xt.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 12:37:21AM -0500, Jason Halbert wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
> Why is vi the default choice of editor for UNIX and how did it become
> the default?  I find it cumbersome.
> 
> I'm just curious of it's advantages over joe or pico or any of the
> others.

It comes installed with the base system.

I think cumbersome is the wrong adjective.  Perhaps you mean
"frustrating?"

Anyways, I tend to figure ee might be a better choice for default
editor.  It is more intuitive to use than vi.

-danny

-- 
http://dannyman.toldme.com/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010608230043.D418>