Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 22:52:51 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml Message-ID: <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-PSNOUhAE+M1iQv7c59Md
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
V ne, 07. 12. 2003 v 18:19, Colin Percival p=ED=B9e:
> By my count, there are 614 ports maintainers who are either not listed=
,=20
> or listed using a different email address, in=20
> doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml.
> Would anyone object if I sent out a form letter to these apparently=20
> unlisted contributors, asking them if they'd like to be listed? (And is=20
> someone willing to commit the resulting massive patch when I collect the=20
> replies together?)
I was under impression that only authors of new ports are listed there.
If someone take existing port, he's not automatically listed there.
Rather than maintainer field you should pursue Whom: from port Makefiles
headers.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
<pav@oook.cz>
--=-PSNOUhAE+M1iQv7c59Md
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQA/06EzntdYP8FOsoIRAtCqAJ4ipMjuEEJT/3TIrO9RpbhWqa5IaQCfTamz
PELg84RMIbtfuNLFh4/ak10=
=4ydE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-PSNOUhAE+M1iQv7c59Md--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1070833971.78821.1.camel>