Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:09:41 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggest to upgrade some software in base Message-ID: <20040628080941.GA35739@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040627170243.GA61973@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040627145408.GA71410@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20040627170243.GA61973@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 10:02:43AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I digged through our base system and looked for versions of contributed > > soft. I found these program which could (and I think should) be easily > > and painlessly upgraded (before 5.3 as 5-STABLE) because they are > > outdated etc... these are: > > > > file - 3.41 -> 4.09 > > Painless upgrade and the benefit is much newer magic file > > ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/file/ > > Only semi-painless. The code and how it is built has changed around a > lot, else I would have upgraded it by now. That said, in progress; but > lower priority than my toolchain work. > > And why does this have to happen before 5-STABLE? I can certainly MFC > something like this. of course it doesnt HAVE to be upgraded but I think it should be... anyway - that was what I saw and considered good candidates for upgrading its up to you to do whats needed ;) I would also like to raise that tcsh upgrade - that is CERTAINLY painless since its only about some 36 bugs repaired and nothing more... roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040628080941.GA35739>