Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:40:03 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa <roop.nanuwa@gmail.com> To: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X servers Message-ID: <75f3f70504071116405845fc32@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20040711174256.2046a84b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> <20040711174256.2046a84b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:42:56 -0500, Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> wrote: > LOL, really fewer features than Windows 98 GDI? Did Windows 98 > recently become network extensible and no one has told me? After a > quick look at what Windows 98's GDI does, I really do not see how > XFree86 fails to measure up to it. > Exactly, you're comparing it to Win98 and saying "Yeah, we can do that too!" Problem is the rest of the world (OS X, Windows > 98) have moved on in what end-user features they provide. Network extensibility is a valid point but I was referring to things like window compositing and other eye candy features. --roop
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75f3f70504071116405845fc32>