Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:38:14 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@supernews.net> Cc: Jeremy Lea <reg@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: USE_GTK and USE_GNOME Message-ID: <39D8B9F6.C55F8257@FreeBSD.org> References: <20001002012649.G30468@shale.csir.co.za> <39D86165.C21837F1@FreeBSD.org> <20001002102510.H15530@supernews.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 01:20:22PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > In general looks fine, however I would like to have a possibility for a more > > fine-grained selection of main GNOME components (libs, core, controlcenter, > > audio, print etc, something like USE_GNOMELIBS, USE_GNOMECORE, USE_GNOMEAUDIO > > etc). > > Given that we're soon to have a massive reworking of the ports tree > (I dunno, I'm ill for 72 hours and the whole world changes :), and given > that GNOME 1.4 is likely to look a lot different than 1.2 (we're probably > going to have two metaports, one containing all the basic functionality, > and the other containing a bunch of "well-used" applications), I suggest > that for now we go ahead with the singular USE_GNOME. > > It can always be fine-tuned later -- the important bit is to get the > basic framework into the tree, instead of just sitting in Jeremy's tree > (and my scratch tree, on occasion). Then at least we should leave `RUN_DEPENDS=panel:blabla' as is, and remove implied gnomecore LIB_DEPENDS from bsd.gnome.mk, because not all GNOME ports really require gnomecore, so if we will merge gnomecore and gnomelibs into single USE_GNOME we will loose information about exactly which ports require gnomecore and which doesn't. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39D8B9F6.C55F8257>