Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:18:48 +0000 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple patch for portsnap to use wget Message-ID: <CAFHbX1%2Bwya7SCq1Z2niM14D=8zFBz=rmof_B7Yj15qn-BS3vkw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKoxK%2B4KsdMRj2YYPGvSFZTiuQXOeP2%2B9ArkC2gCLVb5DFCb1g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKoxK%2B5iy2R7=cZp38xKZpTbgFd0aZ3H28tVmPnuPR01w=pO4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPJF9wnoTCjNM76M-=DdC85P75niKH%2Bta0Vk8X7HORGvT=LLcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKoxK%2B5yrsfnMQG5LnJ2%2BFWMH6PDcWmZhKVrKpxkutHpb=MdNA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKoxK%2B5qivgzMzkOQo7JYOQGAKwyWAf8xfUUR=g5SvpguM2W7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKoxK%2B4KsdMRj2YYPGvSFZTiuQXOeP2%2B9ArkC2gCLVb5DFCb1g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> wrote: > I did a little review and now it is possible to specify to use wget or > not using the portsnap.conf file, as well as the option to ingore > certificate checking even if I don't believe this is correct. > Therefore portsnap with this patch could work with either wget or > phttpget, even if I'm not able to test if the laminating is still > correct for phttpget (someone could test please?). > Why wget and not fetch(1)? Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1%2Bwya7SCq1Z2niM14D=8zFBz=rmof_B7Yj15qn-BS3vkw>