Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/37453: more suitable command-line in articles/releng/article.sgml Message-ID: <200204251700.g3PH03D15635@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/37453; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> To: Hideyuki KURASHINA <rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/37453: more suitable command-line in articles/releng/article.sgml Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Hello, >Number: 37453 >Category: docs >Synopsis: more suitable command-line in articles/releng/article.sgml >Description: > 'cvs up' seems to work as well as 'cvs update', but cvs(1) doesn't > describe it. I think 'cvs update' is more suitable than 'cvs up' as an > article. If cvs(1) doesn't describe 'cvs up' properly, than I think it is the man page which needs the fix and not the article, afaik. All we need to do francly, is to add the following line to the cvs(1) man page which explains the 'update' command: %% Synonyms: up %% P.S: IMHO Regards, -- Hiten Pandya __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204251700.g3PH03D15635>