Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 06:57:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> To: mbendiks@eunet.no, nate@mt.sri.com Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jabley@clear.co.nz Subject: Re: Adding desktop support Message-ID: <199904291057.GAA20645@lakes.dignus.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904291223440.4874-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > The fact that the user may not like the icon you've chosen to use due to > > many criteria, including size, # of colors, transparency, 2D/3D, etc... > > That's where overrides, and such, come into it. Some users will not like > the defaults and want to change them, whereas other users don't want to > mess with it at all. I say, stick a tag in buildworld, and there are no > issues with this. Overrides would be the task of the window manager in > question. > > - Marius - I point out that if the executable has no icon in it, then this "overrides" from the window manager would come into play, right? Since the "overrides" have to be there anyway - what's the advantage of putting the icon in the exe? - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904291057.GAA20645>