Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:05:00 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Nick Kostirya <nikolay.kostirya@i11.co> Cc: arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: upcoming change to iicbb Message-ID: <e070148c-4566-1666-2918-3c6ad8bd5545@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20200604173133.7cd5b4c0@i11.co> References: <0f177c25-7c18-86ab-51e4-718e8626734b@FreeBSD.org> <20200604173133.7cd5b4c0@i11.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/06/2020 17:31, Nick Kostirya wrote: > Will it work on FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE as well? > > I have two sensors that do not work with gpioiic, but work with hardware iic... > Perhaps this patch will be useful to them. I think that the code should be close enough between branches for the patch to apply. If you could test it, that would be great! > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:50:46 +0300 > Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> If you are using the I²C bit-banging driver (iicbb) in any form (e.g., via >> gpioiic) you could be interested in a change that I am planning to commit very >> soon: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22206 >> This is quite a big change to the bit-banging is done. Its goals are to improve >> speeds and robustness. >> >> I will appreciate any reviews, testing or other feedback. >> Thank you. >> -- >> Andriy Gapon >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e070148c-4566-1666-2918-3c6ad8bd5545>