Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
Cc:        Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Michael Reifenberger <root@nihil.plaut.de>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, alc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Anyone able to verify the fix for (was Re: panic: vm_object_shadow: source object has OBJ_ONEMAPPING set.)
Message-ID:  <200004190052.RAA17353@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004151755001.17351-100000@green.dyndns.org> <200004181736.KAA14683@apollo.backplane.com> <20000418194126.C2616@cs.rice.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:
:This patch introduces a new bug.  While it does guarantee that
:the assertion in vm_object_shadow isn't tripped over, it doesn't
:clear the OBJ_ONEMAPPING flag on the newly created shadow object.
:(New objects are created with OBJ_ONEMAPPING set.)  Consequently,
:we'll have two overlapping mappings to the same shadow object
:that has OBJ_ONEMAPPING set.  That's bad.
:
:Alan

    Ach.  I'll just clear in both places.  I really don't have
    time to go through the code and 'do it right', but if
    someone else wants to I'll be happy to review their code.

					-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004190052.RAA17353>