Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 20:49:36 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Dependencies that are needed both to build and run a port Message-ID: <CAN6yY1tUGKapD16a2h53fBC5-qvRPUvctAjgx0D61CszsWkgsQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have hit an issue with the "normal" way dependencies are declared in ports. An example I hit was with graphics/mesa-dri. It needs py-mako both to build and to run. It is declared as a BUILD_DEPENDS (for appropriate GPUs). The problem is that it is that a build dependency and py27-mako does not show mesa-dri as a dependent port, so looks like it may be deleted. Thi is common because, before the pkg system, if a dependency was present at build-time, it was also there at run-time. For functionality, this is still true, but yields a vroken dependency tree. If I add a RUN_DEPENDS to the mesa-dri, py27-mako does show that mesa-dri is dependent, although mesa-dri still does not show py-maku as a dependency. (I don't understand this.) I htink this has resulted in many of the broken dependency trees I have hit on and I suspect that there are quite a few of them. In any case, I think that it should be be clear that a dependency that is needed both to build a port and to run it must be declared as both a run and build dependency. Now I need to stare at the .Mk files for a bit and and see if I can figure out why a RUN_DEPENDS does not get a listing as a dependency from "pkg info -d". -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1tUGKapD16a2h53fBC5-qvRPUvctAjgx0D61CszsWkgsQ>