Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:43:35 +0000 From: Jeremy Faulkner <gldisater@gldis.ca> To: Herve Quiroz <hq@freebsd.org> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Azureus port skeleton for testing Message-ID: <1097189014.37262.15.camel@ocean-deep.gldis.ca> In-Reply-To: <20041007135046.GA99606@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <1097094403.90638.7.camel@ocean-deep.gldis.ca> <20041007135046.GA99606@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-JQ9knkFrTdmK4XBFyitP
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 13:50, Herve Quiroz wrote:
> First, the Makefile itself:
>=20
> - A quick portlint give me the following output:
>=20
> WARN: Makefile: "EXTRACT_ONLY" has to appear earlier.
> WARN: Makefile: "DISTFILES" has to appear earlier.
> WARN: Makefile: "EXTRACT_ONLY" has to appear earlier.
> 0 fatal errors and 3 warnings found.
portlint and I have never gotten along well together, until now.
> - It is generally not a good idea to install JAR files in ${PREFIX}/bin.
> As suggested in [1], a Java application should install its data files
> (such as its JAR files) in an overriden ${DATADIR} which is set to
> ${JAVASHAREDIR}/${PORTNAME}.
Ok.
> Second, looking at your shell script in files/, there are some things
> you may improve:
>=20
> - Too many paths are hardcoded. You may use %%PREFIX%% for instance and
> perform some sed magic in 'do-configure' target. Don't forget to
> differenciate ${PREFIX} (for everything related to the current port)
> and ${LOCALBASE} (for everything else, such as Eclipse stuff).
>=20
> - The same goes for the path of the 'java' executable. You could rather
> use the same kind of sed magic to replace %%JAVA%% with ${JAVA}.
>=20
Yes, I know there are a lot of hard coded values in the script, I even
said as much in my email to the list. The new version of the port that I
just uploaded (10:30 EST Thursday) should be better, and should allow
the use of the motif SWT. I'll test the motif SWT during the weekend.
> That said, this is just a quick review as I don't have enough time ATM.
> If nobody else handles this port by the next days, I will probably
> handle this myself. In such a case, you may send a PR and CC me. We're
> still under ports CVS tree freeze ATM, so there's no hurry here.
>=20
> Herve
I'll create the PR when I'm satisfied with the port. I think the
currently available version is Pretty Damn Close To Done (TM).
--=20
Jeremy Faulkner <gldisater@gldis.ca>
--=-JQ9knkFrTdmK4XBFyitP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBBZcaWfb0Lle2MIEIRAjfjAJ9L3/rh6btKi7a0hfoEEoNneWGfbACeOCih
A+IgUOHq8y2MFugYrPs+QUk=
=5RiG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-JQ9knkFrTdmK4XBFyitP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1097189014.37262.15.camel>