Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Apr 2018 16:21:25 +0200
From:      Peter <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kern.sched.quantum: Creepy, sadistic scheduler
Message-ID:  <f99a6c9a-2b2b-1b46-f89b-c4946eed050a@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <2d3dfb30-fb34-55e4-0572-df17ceb5f66e@freebsd.org>
References:  <pa17m7$82t$1@oper.dinoex.de> <9FDC510B-49D0-4722-B695-6CD38CA20D4A@gmail.com> <8cfdb8a3-86a0-17ba-1e41-ff1912a30ee9@m5p.com> <2d3dfb30-fb34-55e4-0572-df17ceb5f66e@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:
> for a single CPU you really should compile a kernel with SMP turned off
> and 4BSD scheduler.
>
> ULE is just trying too hard to do stuff you don't need.

Julian,

if we agree on this, I am fine.
(This implies that SCHED_4BSD will *not* be retired for an indefinite time!)

I tested yesterday, and SCHED_4BSD doesn't show the annoying behaviour.
SMP seems to be no problem (and I need that), but PREEMPTION is 
definitely related to the problem (see my other message sent now).

P.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f99a6c9a-2b2b-1b46-f89b-c4946eed050a>