Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:02:36 +0100 From: Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr> To: Tomas Verbaitis <tomasv@megalogika.lt> Cc: liukang@bjut.edu.cn, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5 startup and shutdown.. again Message-ID: <20051108160236.GA5400@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> In-Reply-To: <20051021070012.GA6786@megalogika.lt> References: <20051020175328.GA7205@megalogika.lt> <20051020221548.GA3979@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> <20051021070012.GA6786@megalogika.lt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:00:12AM +0300, Tomas Verbaitis wrote: > I still think my proposed change still should be applied as it at least > gets the default situation right, when both tomcat55ctl and rcNG script > refer to the same JVM. The "administrative" approach to this problem > would be only to put a warning near the place where > jakarta_tomcat%%TOMCAT_VERSION%%_java_home is defined. "Technically" i > aggree that it's better to get rid of tomcat55ctl as a program, no > matter how convenient and usual it was. We now have reached the timeout for maintainer feedback on this topic. I was about to commit your suggested changes and then, after reading your message I was wondering whether this could be the right time to get rid of tomcat55ctl. So I ask tomcat users from this list for feedback. I would like to find out how often is tomcatXXctl used rather than the rc(8) script. After a short survey in my surroundings it seems like everybody uses the rc(8) script and thus removing tomcatXXctl would bring no harm now that rcNG script no longer uses tomcatXXctl... Herve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051108160236.GA5400>