Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 19:24:56 -0800 (PST) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG> To: nugundam@la.best.com Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sendmail throughput (was: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required.) Message-ID: <199901030324.TAA06170@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <19990102055658.A5621@la.best.com> (nugundam@la.best.com) References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812312308520.9916-100000@thelab.hub.org> <199901011525.HAA22294@hub.freebsd.org> <19990102055658.A5621@la.best.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 05:56:58 -0800 > From: "Joseph T. Lee" <nugundam@la.best.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Fri, Jan 01, 1999 at 07:25:30AM -0800, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > > yes, freebsd-current is only 1411 subscribers. you deleted the > > part about delivery rate. delivery rate is very important. imagine > > receiving mail 30 minutes or 3 hours later than everyone else on the > > list. make participation difficult and fustrating. > > This sounds more like the discussion could be based in a newgroup > format, which is designed for this kind of loading and response type > forum; besides the prevalent available threading clients, and only > dling/reading what you're interested in. > > I know there's comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc, but I guess keeping the lists > closed to subscribers only, is the priority. news seems to have even more flamage than the mailing lists. with mail i can control spam, with news everyone would have to control spam. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901030324.TAA06170>