Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:52:55 +0200 From: Nikolay Pavlov <qpadla@gmail.com> To: "Joao Barros" <joao.barros@gmail.com> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support Message-ID: <200802072052.56918.qpadla@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0802071018n389afa3bu161eaa5c6563cbc0@mail.gmail.com> References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <200802071941.23199.qpadla@gmail.com> <70e8236f0802071018n389afa3bu161eaa5c6563cbc0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 07 February 2008 20:18:42 Joao Barros wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 5:41 PM, Nikolay Pavlov <qpadla@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 07 February 2008 14:47:41 Eric Anderson wrote: > > > FUSE is slow, requires a port (unless PUFFS is ported, which I've > > > probed about before). > > > > I think this is not an argument: > > http://www.ntfs-3g.org/performance.html > > Eric has valid points. > How relevant is a benchmark on Linux to your argument? But it's a userland application. This page is demonstration of it's potential performance that could be achieved, but were is the FreeBSD NTFS implementation stats? Let me ask you: compered to what FUSE is slow? -- ====================================================================== - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. <<<----------------------------------- ======================================================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802072052.56918.qpadla>