Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 01:19:49 +0200 From: Peter van Dijk <petervd@vuurwerk.nl> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel build number in 4.0-STABLE Message-ID: <20000508011949.E33707@vuurwerk.nl> In-Reply-To: <20000507205450.A4313@gamma>; from alexander@frolkin.demon.co.uk on Sun, May 07, 2000 at 08:54:50PM %2B0100 References: <018201bfb842$8277b9e0$0200000a@danco> <200005071838.NAA92225@sullivan.realtime.net> <20000507205450.A4313@gamma>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Alexander Frolkin wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 01:38:49PM -0500, Bruce Burden wrote: > > > > > I've built three kernels now, using the new 'make buildkernel installkernel > > > KERNEL=<YOURKERNEL>' method, but the kernel build number isn't incrementing: > > > > > I thought it was "config" that bumped the number, not the > > Makefile... > > The number is bumped by the newvers.sh script which runs at the end of the > build process. Which makes perfect sense now that I think of it. You can't bump the number beforehand, because the first kernel would be #1 then and not #0. Greetz, Peter. -- Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder | | 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; | C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.' | Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000508011949.E33707>