Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:29:57 -0800 From: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WARNS=6 changes Message-ID: <20030316162956.A78205@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20030317025513.I14238@gamplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:58:13AM %2B1100 References: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org> <20030316062315.GA75492@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpof4bcu8b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030317025513.I14238@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:58:13AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > -ansi -pedantic is required to give a C compiler (C90). Without it you > don't even get warnings about errors, so it should be the first warning > level. I purposefully make WARNS=1 be only -Wall as that is all most people outside of FreeBSD use. Setting the standard (for the purpose of warnings) sounds like a fine thing to do at WARNS=2 and above. After reading RU's opinion that WARNS=X to be a constant set of warning options, no variable portion, I have to agree. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030316162956.A78205>