Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 03:21:58 +0200 From: Ivan Krstic <ike@gnjilux.srk.fer.hr> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: distributed natd Message-ID: <20010810032158.T3889@gnjilux.cc.fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <200108100115.LAA20997@tungsten.austclear.com.au>; from ahl@austclear.com.au on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 11:15:04AM %2B1000 References: <200108100115.LAA20997@tungsten.austclear.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 11:15:04AM +1000, Tony Landells wrote: > I've been thinking about ways to improve the robustness of my firewall > and I came up with the following idea, so I thought I'd run it past > some other people for feedback. I'm not sure I understood correctly - what are you aiming for? The performance increase due to two firewalls simultaneously processing traffic or the reduncancy of having one firewall take over if the other fails? If it's the latter, I believe there are simpler solutions than rewriting natd. -- Ivan Krstic - ike " life is the road beneath my feet, love is the girl I wait to meet, and art is everything I create, rob me of any and I will hate, you, my God, my devil, my fate " To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010810032158.T3889>